Talk:Anomochilus weberi

Anomochilus weberi has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Anomochilus weberi is part of the Anomochilus series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 25, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed
September 19, 2023	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Anomochilus weberi is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 17:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anomochilus weberi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 02:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this review, will have notes out soon. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 02:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Only one image. rights are in order.
Needs an image caption
- Added.
Consider adding ALT text.
- Done.

Sourcing

Nothing of note.

Copy-vios

Earwig gives the all clear
Nothing on spot checks.

Prose

'dwarf pipesnake family Anomochilidae.' awkward phrasing
- Standard formatting across most taxon articles I've written, don't really know a better way to write it.
"In 1890, the Dutch herpetologist..." Sentence is difficult to follow
- Split it up.
"authorities merge the latter family into the former" be more specific, tighten up sentence as a whole
- Added names of families, not sure how to tighten the sentence up.
"When preserved in alcohol, the species' color changes to mainly brown" Sentence is out of sequence with the rest of the paragraph
- Rearranged para.
'Greater Sunda Islands' specify that this is part of Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia
- Added Indonesian Archipelago, which makes more sense biogeographically and should still be identifiable for a lay audience.

Comment: Okay, this is really close to GA criteria already, apologies if I'm being a bit nit-picky with this. It's short as well, so the review is going to be equally short. I made a few minor edits, please review when you can. On hold. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AryKun, giving you a customary ping. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Etriusus, have addressed all of your comments. Thanks for the review! AryKun (talk) 12:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

🏵️Etrius ( Us) 17:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.